The train dilemma exercise sucks! Understanding that the dilemma is a test, a moral test to see what people would do in no-win situations. I could channel my best Captain Kirk and say that I don’t believe in no-win scenarios, but I’d fail that this specific test because I need to explain myself in what I would do in these tests. Test #1 I’m a train switchperson and a train is about to hit five children. I could throw the switch and kill one child or take no action and let the train kill five children. What to do? We know from this test that if I do nothing, one child lives. If I do nothing, five children die. If I take action and throw the switch, one child dies because of me. If I take no action and don’t throw the switch, five children die because of me. Looking at it from this vantagepoint, and because both my action and inaction would cause death, I would choose to save the five children. Philosophers have maintained that the intuitive position is that it is acceptable to fli...