Skip to main content

Becoming a Critical Thinker

My Current Reflection

It has been close to two decades since I picked up my critical thinking hat and put it on. Until the start of this course, this is the furthest I have been from critical thinking in my life. Now reacquainted, I believe in my abilities to pick back up where I left off in the year 2000, but not without first needing some serious practice. When I start to think about my competencies in becoming a critical thinker, I want to first look at a definition of critical thinking so that I can baseline my skillset. Critical Thinking is the art of analyzing and evaluating thinking with a view to improving it (Paul & Elder, 2014). It is not simply enough to think about my thinking, but to think to improve my thinking.

How far have I come?

When I started this course, my understanding of critical thinking was very small and narrow. I did not see critical thinking as an objective or a necessity, but instead understood it to be a concept for intellectual people. For me, there wasn’t any “going around the circle” of the elements or using intellectual standards. When would I ever use these techniques or apply them in daily situations? The truly exciting part of this course has been the application of a new way of thinking. Instead of thinking how to use elements, standards or traits in previous conversations, I’m beginning to think about my thinking while it is happening. 

Learning Habits

The best way to describe how I’ve internalized the concepts from this course is to describe how I prepare to exercise my critical thinking. I always try to clear my mind of any intentional bias, whether it be through my interpretation, assumption or point of view. If I’m able to objectively look at a situation or question, I know I’m preparing myself for being in the right frame of mind. 

I know that one of the most impactful changes I can make to my thinking habits is to consciously think about eliminating my bias before engaging in conversation or debate with someone. I feel that all too often, I’m a creature of habit and I want to apply my own perspective to a situation, rather than be consistently openminded. Much like with the Elements of Thought, I must ask myself, what is my purpose? 

To Coach Or Not To Coach

There are a few people in my circle of friends that know about critical thinking. Having someone to practice with is certainly a bonus, especially as I continue to grasp the basic understanding of critical thinking. Using a thinking partner is a great way to keep evolving my thinking and prevent it from drifting into the barriers of egocentric or sociocentric thinking. Confront the impediments to critical thinking (Nosich, 2012, p. 45). My personal experiences, patterns and fear lead to bias, so I must confront these impediments to aid in my critical thinking journey.

In order for me to fully develop my critical thinking skills, I must take part in more critical thinking exercises. I need to reflect more about my thinking, especially before I even start thinking. It will be helpful if I can spend more time with my two or three friends that understand critical thinking, so that we can keep each other on the correct path. I find that it is efficient when someone else is also being mindful of how we're using our critical thinking and to call each other out for not using the standards, elements and traits in the appropriate way. If I can lean on my critical thinking friends, eliminate my bias and practice being openminded, I believe I can continue to grow and develop these very important skills.

Marques Thomey
September 3, 2019
References:

Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2014). Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools (7th Ed.) 

Nosich, G. (2012). Learning to think things through, A guide to critical thinking across the curriculum. (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Team level ICT

  Team level ICT Learning more about Intentional Change Theory (ICT) draws my attention closer to the individual level of the change. We understand the path involves specific steps within the individual mental process, however, there is much to be learned about applying ICT to a team concept. “ At the group level, the ideal self could be described as a shared ideal, or vision, which would be derived through: ·        emergent awareness of a shared hope; ·        collective imagery regarding the ideal purpose and functioning of the group; and ·        realization and articulation of a core identity of the group.” ( Akrivou, 2016, p. 699). Applying this concept to historical events might make it easier to understand. Take for instance the United States Women’s Olympic Soccer teams from the last 30 years and their shear dominance of the sport. These teams operated at such a high level f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dear Marques

  Dear Marques, You’ve continued to gain a lot more knowledge of leadership, the foundational approaches using different aspects from the elements of theories, and a profound appreciation for senior leaders. The question before you today is – what will you do to get back to the mountain top? Your Personal Vision You’ve stated that your personal vision is “to be happy as much as possible” (Thomey, 2021, p. 2). We both know that you were at your best when you were happiest. Whether on the mountain top or not, you brought out the best in yourself when you were happy. You need to find a way to get back to that place so everything else can fall into place. Three Learning Goals In order to accomplish your personal vision, you must establish three learning goals with milestones so that you have a plan and a pathway for getting this done. Your first goal should be to reengage with the Dale Carnegie group for continuing education classes. I know you found this group to have a tra...
Post a Comment
Read more

Framing Complex Decisions

At the nation’s 18 th busiest airport, Detroit Metro Airport is not immune to complex decision-making. Simple decisions can sometimes turn into much more complex issues and vice versa. Complex issues can seldom be solved within a single frame ( Hoch, Kunreuther, & Gunther, 2001, p. 154). As I’ve learned, frames not only work as a tool to understand problems from different points of view, they can also provide clarity, especially when dealing with complex issues. For example, take root cause analysis (RCA) and how simple methods of determine how and why something failed can be applied to the organization so that you can prevent the same mistake from happening again and again. As simple as the method is of asking why something failed, you’d think we were teaching skilled trades personnel Latin. Incorporating a change like RCA takes a lot of time and patience. They way in which we approached our teams to include RCA in their routines first involved identifying and analyzing a...
Post a Comment
Read more