Skip to main content

Listen to the Music


The Ted talk video clip with Talgam was an interested look at how leadership behaviors are shown through musical conductors. Having played an instrument in an orchestra style band for 10 years, I can relate to the different conductor’s styles. During my time in the band, we had 4 different conductors and each of them had different expectations and had varying demands. Using conductors is a genius idea. It allows for the comparisons, similarities and differences between the theory of leadership and conductors acting as leaders. The comical way Talgam portrays the conductors and their individual personalities was a great way to emotionally connect the ideas presented through the conductor’s leadership methods.
I think that Talgam was able to make these connections because of the straightforward manner each of these conductors led their orchestras. Whether it was aggressively or passively, each conductor was exhibiting some kind of reaction and it was fun to see this throughout the video.

In my opinion, all musicians are really part of the in-group. As followers, the musicians see the conductor as the leader of the music. As much as some of the video’s commentary mentions the conductors are allowing the musicians to take over, there are still plenty of examples of the conductors guiding the orchestras throughout the video. Northouse says, “those that were based on expanded and negotiated role responsibilities (extra-roles), which were called the in-group” (pg. 22, 2018). In this manner, I believe musicians are all part of the in-group. Otherwise, you’d see musicians simply refusing to play or not play well.

In Making Sense of Leadership: Exploring the Five Key Roles Used by Effective Leaders, it mentions John Adair being one of the first writers to demonstrate that leadership is a trainable skill and the definition of management beyond task control and production to include decision making and communication activities. Using Adair’s theory, we can see that these conductors learned and honed their craft over time. Each conductor has created his own way of leading these orchestras.

Playing music and being in a group of high performing group of people is very task oriented. The musicians practice while the conductor leads them through the music. But in the case of the Ted Talk video, these conductors having taken the task of playing music to a different level by establishing relationships with the musicians to the point that in some examples, the conductor just stands there, nods or makes small gestures. I see that transactional, path-goal and skills approach leadership are all in action.

Talgam’s examples left me feeling nostalgic about my time playing music. I think he’s ideas of leadership through the eyes of talented and accomplished conductors were well thought out and they apply to an interesting side of leadership. There is more to the establishment of relationships in leadership than I can really imagine. We all know leaders, both fictional and in real life that can command the authority of a room with just a look. Conductors, in many ways, are critical to the success of an orchestra and it is build on the relationship with each member of the team. There is bias on both sides, because even if a musician didn’t care for the conductor, while they are part of the team, they must perform and be held accountable for their actions. I see quite a similarity between this example and that of an office environment. The difference is the sweet, sweet music!

Marques Thomey
November 16, 2019

References:

Cameron, E and Green, M. (2008). Making Sense of Leadership: Exploring the Five Key Roles Used by Effective Leaders. Kogan Page Publishers. ISBN: 0749455586, 9780749455583
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (7th Ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publishing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Marques

  Dear Marques, You’ve continued to gain a lot more knowledge of leadership, the foundational approaches using different aspects from the elements of theories, and a profound appreciation for senior leaders. The question before you today is – what will you do to get back to the mountain top? Your Personal Vision You’ve stated that your personal vision is “to be happy as much as possible” (Thomey, 2021, p. 2). We both know that you were at your best when you were happiest. Whether on the mountain top or not, you brought out the best in yourself when you were happy. You need to find a way to get back to that place so everything else can fall into place. Three Learning Goals In order to accomplish your personal vision, you must establish three learning goals with milestones so that you have a plan and a pathway for getting this done. Your first goal should be to reengage with the Dale Carnegie group for continuing education classes. I know you found this group to have a tra...

Consequentialism vs Deontology

  Consequentialism vs Deontology Is it a glass half-empty or a glass half-full? It appears to me that what separates consequentialism and deontology is perspective. LaFollette (2007) writes that consequentialists must explain which consequences we should count, how much weight or consideration we should give those that do count, and how we should use these considerations when deliberating (p. 25). However, deontology is usually regarded as a foil to consequentialism ( Heinzelmann, 2018, p. 5201). What I find as the takeaway from this situation is that consequentialism isn’t necessarily grounded in morality, whereas deontology finds itself in a set of negative rules. As LaFollette points out with consequentialism, we must look at and use several dimensions to understand and consider what are the consequences of a situation. Deontology doesn’t require this additional gate check, but instead relies on our experience learning right and wrong from the negative perspective. Much like a...