Skip to main content

Collaborative Decision Making


Decision-Making In Resolution
When the Wayne County Airport Authority (WCAA) was riding high and enjoying record breaking passenger traffic in 2019, they decided to make significant improvements to the newest terminal at Detroit Metro Airport (DTW), the North Terminal. The North Terminal opened in 2008 and had not undergone any extensive improvements since then. The leadership of the WCAA decided that certain enhancements should be made to continue our high level of customer service to our passengers. The WCAA decided to make changes to the facade of the terminal as well as to install new common use kiosks for passengers to use when checking their baggage. In all, the improvements to the terminal would have cost approximately $30,000,000. The budget at DTW is set up in a residual format, which means that the airlines pay for our operating budget each year. In order to make the enhancements to the North Terminal, the WCAA needed to obtain the approval of the airlines at the airport. Needing the input and approval of the stakeholders of the North Terminal airlines was critical to these enhancements. The WCAA had just won the JD power award for the best mega airport in North America in 2019, and the airport authority wanted to make sure we kept our status as one of the best airports in the country and continent.
The process that the WCAA went through to gain the support of the stakeholders was to first engage them in an exercise that showed the critical assets, especially those that were forward customer facing, their condition and how they could be improved. A presentation was made to the airlines that showed how the North terminal needed to be brought up to a higher standard. Once the presentation was made to the airlines, the WCAA began working towards a budget resolution for the funding that would be necessary for these improvements. The WCAA showed how these improvements would continue to support excellent customer service to the passengers, but also that it would reduce costs by allowing the airlines to repurpose some of their personnel to other areas of their operation. This return on investment was critical to the success of this plan, as it showed how it would not only provide a much-needed facelift for the terminal, but also that it would help with productivity. Ultimately, the outcome that we were hoping for was reached, as the airlines agreed in principle to fund this project.
Stakeholder engagement in this process was the number one factor in its success. As the airlines fund the WCAA’s budget, they would also have to fund these improvements. The airlines helped the WCAA get to the point in which we could have their blessing to move forward with the project. Taking time to articulate a vision that incorporates the desires of all people involved is not a causal matter (Levine, 2009, p. 181).
3 Ways I Can Learn From This Exercise
The most important part of this situation was to gain the acceptance of the airlines. I learned that the WCAA could have done a better job by including the airlines in the preliminary discussions beforehand. Rather than do all the work and then present the findings to the airlines, I would have a charrette event that would bring the WCAA and airlines together so that they can be part of the design of the North Terminal. Working hand in hand with the airlines would strengthen our relationships and allow the airlines to be collaborative partners. Second, I can use this experience to be more prepared for similar situations. There will be more opportunities for the WCAA to work together with the airlines and I will have a much closer role in future projects in my department. Understanding how the groups came together to discuss this project will be helpful for me in the future. Lastly, I can use this exercise as a constant reminder that working collaboratively with people, especially in the aviation industry will undoubtedly make the outcome more positive. Even if the airlines had rejected the project, we would still have the takeaway that we worked together and built stronger relationships in the process.
References
Levine, S. (2009). Getting to resolution turning conflict into collaboration (Second). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How I make choosing easier

In Sheena Iyengar’s TEDx video (2011), she describes four techniques you can use to improve choosing or decision-making. These techniques included cut, concretize, categorize and condition. Each technique is unique, and I have used these at one point or another in my life. As Iyengar describes it, she says to “be choosy about choosing” (Iyengar, 2011) which is a brilliant statement that summarizes her video about making choices. Whether you’re a child or an adult, everyone goes through each day having to make many decisions. All too often, we over complicate scenarios in which we could have used these techniques to improve our decision-making. The two techniques I’d like to discuss are cut and categorize. Cut or cutting, involves reducing or outright eliminating choices from the decision matrix. In order to make choosing easier, we must reduce the number of choices. Iyengar (2011) points out the choice overload problem, where as consumers, we are overloaded with far too many choice...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Strengths and Weaknesses

  My Distinctive Strengths I feel like a lot of what I do I do really well. When I put my mind to it, I believe I can do whatever I want. I know that I’m well organized, I’m a great communicator, I’m someone that recognizes strengths in other people and I’m also great at building people up. My Potential Strengths I know I can do better in some areas, but certain things prevent me from accomplishing them. Namely, if I don’t already have work in my queue, I’m really not that interested in adding it. This also adds to a lack of focus, which is something I know I should do better. Also, I think I could do a better job at remembering things if I applied myself more to the situation. Dispositions That Support Me My positivity is at the top of the list for me that I don’t want to change. I get so much of my mojo from being and staying positive that I can’t see myself changing this. I also think that my faith is something that I wouldn’t change, unless I did it for myself. That i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Guns, Guns, Guns

  Guns Do we have a right to bear arms? According to LaFollette (2007), this is a moral question, not a constitutional one (p. 180). The United States Constitution certainly says we do. Millions of citizens would also say we do, as well. Hundreds of years ago, the founding fathers of this country decided that people should be able own firearms. It wasn’t simply owning the weapons that they were intent on stating, but that it was a right of every person. A right means that no one can take it away from you for any reason. Just like freedom of speech, everyone has the right to own a gun. However, there are concerns, rightfully so, from people who wish to create a more sensible approach to this right. Gun control advocates have long considered accidents involving guns a major reason for introducing greater regulation of firearms, including such measures as mandated training for gun purchases, firearm safety locks, and strict limitations on the ownership of handguns ( Utter & Spi...
Post a Comment
Read more