Skip to main content

Really Listening


When have you really listened?
Our lives are made up of moments that can sometimes feel like they’re flying by us. We gravitate towards our own self-interests, wants and needs so that we feel better about who we are and what we’re doing. Too frequently that means we don’t take the time to hear each other. We are waiting impatiently to speak or thinking about what we’re going to say (Levine, 2009, p. 131). Instead of being laser-focused on what the other person is saying, we think about how we want to respond. A lot of times, we choose to interrupt the person because we either don’t want to forget what we want to say, or we want clarifying information. Listening to someone, really listening to someone takes effort, timing and patience. It is an important information gathering vehicle for all concerned (Levine, 2009, p. 121).
Conflict of the heart
Recently, my wife’s uncle took his own life. It was a tremendous burden on the family and caused a lot of grief. Although this wasn’t a conflict caused by angry coworkers or a retail agent telling a customer to wear a facial covering in a store, this very much was a conflict of the heart. There was so much pain involved for so many people, the least I could do was listen to them tell their stories about their uncle, father and brother. That is why the first action step in the Cycle of Resolution is the opportunity for each participant to tell their story from beginning to end, without interruption (Levine, 2009, p. 122).
I feel a sense of duty when coming to the aid of my family, especially when it means they need to cope with a tragic loss like a family member. I spent a lot of the past week just listening to my wife and her family tell stories about their uncle. As with the grieving process, they needed to reminisce about the good memories they had with each other. There was a lot of crying and hugging, but most of all, there was a lot of listening. Each person took time to share their thoughts and memories and you could see everyone being lifted little by little, until there were more smiles and laughs than frowns and tears. When you initially become involved in resolving a conflict, it is essential to listen to the story, the whole story, in the way the other person wants to tell it (Levine, 2009, p. 123).
The difference with listening
When you take the time to listen to someone, you learn more about them and yourself. By giving someone else an opportunity to share their thoughts and feelings with you, it helps your ability to be more empathetic and ultimately a better communicator. This differs from my normal communication, because I’m usually more less patient to wait for all the details. I’m too quick to jump to the conclusion and should do a better job of giving people their chance to talk without interruption. I’ve learned that I frustrate myself most of the time, because I’m not taking my own advice. This is a consequence of not treating people better and it can be corrected by simply letting the other person speak. Let them tell their story the way they want to tell it. This not only will help with resolving the conflict, but will also make you a more complete person.
References
Levine, S. (2009). Getting to resolution turning conflict into collaboration (Second). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Marques

  Dear Marques, You’ve continued to gain a lot more knowledge of leadership, the foundational approaches using different aspects from the elements of theories, and a profound appreciation for senior leaders. The question before you today is – what will you do to get back to the mountain top? Your Personal Vision You’ve stated that your personal vision is “to be happy as much as possible” (Thomey, 2021, p. 2). We both know that you were at your best when you were happiest. Whether on the mountain top or not, you brought out the best in yourself when you were happy. You need to find a way to get back to that place so everything else can fall into place. Three Learning Goals In order to accomplish your personal vision, you must establish three learning goals with milestones so that you have a plan and a pathway for getting this done. Your first goal should be to reengage with the Dale Carnegie group for continuing education classes. I know you found this group to have a tra...

Consequentialism vs Deontology

  Consequentialism vs Deontology Is it a glass half-empty or a glass half-full? It appears to me that what separates consequentialism and deontology is perspective. LaFollette (2007) writes that consequentialists must explain which consequences we should count, how much weight or consideration we should give those that do count, and how we should use these considerations when deliberating (p. 25). However, deontology is usually regarded as a foil to consequentialism ( Heinzelmann, 2018, p. 5201). What I find as the takeaway from this situation is that consequentialism isn’t necessarily grounded in morality, whereas deontology finds itself in a set of negative rules. As LaFollette points out with consequentialism, we must look at and use several dimensions to understand and consider what are the consequences of a situation. Deontology doesn’t require this additional gate check, but instead relies on our experience learning right and wrong from the negative perspective. Much like a...