Skip to main content

Reflections on the Cynefin Framework


How the Cynefin Framework benefits my decision-making
As I continue to learn about the Cynefin Framework, I see its application across many decisions I’ve made. As Snowden (2010) describes it, we should manage our business lives within the complex and complicated domains, rather than the simple and chaotic. This is due to the boundary between the simple and chaotic domains, which is easy to fall into because of previous success and complacency. Understanding this, as well as the fact that the simple domain is relatively predictable and chaotic domains require people to think differently allows me to feel and react to possibly slipping into the wrong domain.
Two examples
The two examples that I can use to depict decisions I’ve made that are in the complex and complicated domains are:
1)   Complex – I worked as a Robotics Maintenance Manager at a brand-new Amazon Fulfillment Center (FC) and had to train 30 technicians on numerous areas of the operation. There were many issues to overcome when opening a new FC and it was extremely difficult to pull together 30 people that had also never worked in an FC like this. At this point in my career, I had managed large groups of people and was successful in doing so. However, because we were all learning the processes set forth by Amazon for their robotic operation, it was hard to understand or predict what would happen next. In the world of Amazon, things happen at breakneck speeds and there isn’t a lot of forgiveness when things go wrong. That is why, instead of attempting to impose a course of action, leaders must patiently allow the path forward to reveal itself (Snowden & Boone, 2007). I prefer to be able to have a certain amount of control with my teams and over the situation. In this case, we were all at the mercy of Amazon. Rather than train my team on the entire playbook for robotic operations, I focused on those items that were constantly being discussed and reviewed by the Amazon leadership. Of the 25 training tasks we needed to complete, I prioritized them in order of importance to Amazon, instead of just starting a number one and working through it sequentially. This resulted in my team’s effectiveness being maximized and my employees gaining some much-needed confidence that we were finally on the right track. I didn’t really choose this path, but the path showed itself to me through consistent communication and active listening to the Amazon brass.
2)   Complicated – Working as a Maintenance Manager at a distribution facility for a grocery chain, I had to juggle the unpredictability of a conveyor system that hadn’t been upgraded in 20 years. The PLCs were out of date and the maintenance team didn’t understand how to evaluate their work. When I first arrived, I was underwater with the number of breakdowns and outages the system was experiencing. I had also never worked with conveyor systems before and didn’t really understand the first thing about how to address the situation. Working in unfamiliar environments can help leaders and experts approaches decision making more creatively (Snowden & Boone, 2007). Luckily for me, I engaged the experts – our contractors – to assist with diagnosing the issues with the system. I also realized that I needed a better understanding of how to measure the system. Not having the expertise certainly put me at a disadvantage, but I overcame this by working hard and studying the practices invented by Toyota almost 70 years ago called Total Productive Maintenance (TPM). Within this TPM, I found several measuring points, such as overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and eventually taught my teams how to use it, along with 5 Why and other Lean methodologies. Even though this was a highly complicated issue that I had no real experience with, I was successful because I used good practice techniques, asked for help from the experts and educated myself on TPM.
Assessing the Cynefin Framework
I believe the Cynefin Framework is quite helpful for people to understand how the many aspects of life can influence and affect our decision-making. The framework sorts the issues facing leaders into five contexts defined by the nature of the relationship between cause and effect (Snowden & Boone, 2007). In many ways, the Cynefin Framework reminds us that both humans and the situations we face can be predictable and unpredictable. It allows us to use our experiences in different ways to supply us with the knowledge to be successful in our outcomes depending on the circumstances. Life is a complicated process that involves a lot of learning and having a system in place to better understand how we can navigate through it is a way to be ahead of the curve.
I can give you five ways the Cynefin Framework can help provide an improved context for decision-making.
1)      It can give us clarity. Even with just a basic understanding of the framework, people can use it to learn how to operate in the proper domain and see things through those specific domains.
2)      It can help make decisions faster. When we understand the situation, we’re in, we can more quickly use the framework to identify the domain and then react to situations accordingly.
3)      It acts as a reminder. The Cynefin Framework consists of many important leadership theories. Depending on the situation, it reminds us not to micromanage, not to be complacent, to be patient and to be creative.
4)      It can encourage us. Whether it adds risk, creativity or understanding, the Cynefin Framework give us the encouragement to use different approaches and adds tools to our toolbox. It provides us with the knowledge to be prepared for opportunities that we may completely miss if we didn’t understand each domain.
5)      It can make us more effective leaders. If we truly use the framework as a guide through our experiences, we can improve our communication with others, exercise better judgement and gain the acceptance of others through positive outcomes. Good leadership requires openness to change on an individual level (Snowden & Boone, 2007).
Three ways the quadrants can facilitate decision-making
Each of the quadrants from the Cynefin Framework that were discussed in the video Snowden (2011) presented has its own way of facilitating decision-making. Using my own experiences, here are three examples from each quadrant that can facilitate decision-making.
Simple
1)      My simple children – With two young children in my household, their behavior is still very predictable. In the mornings, they wake up and immediately want breakfast, which I make for them. As they age, my decision to make them breakfast or teach them how to make breakfast becomes an easier decision. I’ve now decided that they must make their own breakfasts so that I can focus on my routine more now.
2)      My simple wife – My wife likes to take the mornings very easy and slow, whereas I’m up and ready to take on the world. I’ve learned to temper my behavior and emotions in the morning based on the almost negative feedback from her that I’m just ‘too much’ in the mornings. The decision to change my behavior to allow my wife to slowly wake up has resulted in less fighting throughout the day.
3)      My simple job – I’ve seen how my team reacts to pressure at work. I like to challenge my team more by giving them more work. However, I’ve sensed pushback from one coworker when he gets too much work on his plate. In this simple example, the cause of me giving him too much work results in the effect of pushback from him. I’ve learned to predict how much work is too much work and change my assignments based on that learning.
Complicated
1)      My complicated children – Although my kids are young, my daughter is growing faster and faster before my eyes. She has started asking questions about her body, which I generally let her mother answer. However, there are times in which I answer some of these questions, because I feel confident in answering based on my expertise and the situation. I wouldn’t want to give her bad feedback, because it could have negative consequences. I’ve learned to answer what I know, delegate what I should and always be honest.
2)      My complicated wife – As I’ve come to know my wife over the years, she can always surprise me with things I wasn’t prepared for. I’ve had to learn when to approach her with questions or feelings and it isn’t always straightforward with her. I’ve tried to understand how to read her body language and facial expressions, but that isn’t always the answer. Women are complicated beings and my wife certainly fits that mold.
3)      My complicated job – I was recently given a new role and with it came new responsibilities. I only have a basic understanding of the real estate world, but now I’m in charge of it. I’ve had to lean on our resident experts at my job, so that I don’t make mistakes. However, there are times when I need to decide if I’m going to take a swing at answering the question or engage my experts. This isn’t always an easy decision, as there are many levels of knowledge in real estate.
Complex
1)      My complex children – As much as my children are predictable, they have been surprising me more as they get older and have become more unpredictable. The behaviors they used to exhibit are now scattered throughout their ever-growing behaviors.
2)      My complex wife – If you believe in astrological signs, then you’d know my wife is fire and I’m water. We don’t always see eye-to-eye and it shows with our arguments. Over our almost 11 years together, we learn new things about each other constantly. There are many predictable things in our relationship but knowing there is more to learn provides me with an understanding that I won’t always get it right. I must remember to reflect on an argument after the fact, so I don’t make the same mistake again.
3)      My complex job – As I previously mentioned, I recently took on a new role in Real Estate and I’ve been drinking from a fire hose since April 1. I’ve quickly learned that I must do a better job with reflecting not only with my wife, but at work, as well. When I power through a new issue and make a mistake, the same situation applies where I must put in place parameters to prevent issues from occurring again. I’ve learned to roll with the unpredictability in my work, learn from those mistakes and be complete in my prevention of the same thing happening again.
Chaotic
1)      My chaotic children – There is no better example of chaotic domain than with my kids. Developing minds need a lot of support and as much as we know about this, there remains much still to learn. I’m no child psychologist, but I can emphatically say that my kids both have needs outside my abilities. Parenting is the most difficult job on the planet. I’m aware that I can’t apply the same measures from one of my kids to the other, as they both have separate needs. All I can do is continue to practice being the best parent I can be.
2)      My chaotic wife – Men are from one planet and women are from another. We know this to be true. As I’ve stated, my wife and I aren’t always on the same page and we struggle to understand one another. Like the chaotic situation with my kids, I must be patient and practice being the best husband I can be. I must use excellent judgement and specialized communication skills with my wife to do this.
3)      My chaotic job – When COVID-19 nearly shutdown the entire commercial aviation industry, it was a very chaotic scene and one that reminded me of the events on September 11, 2001. But rather than it being an event on one day, it lasted several weeks. As the industry grinded to a halt and in the middle of my taking on a new role, things were extremely hard for me to keep up. I knew I couldn’t use the same managerial skills I once did in this situation. I needed to take command of the situation and calm my team using leadership techniques I learned from my classes at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. By taking command and showing confidence in uncertain times, I was able to navigate my team through these changes. Additionally, our airport began the layoff process with at-will employees, which caused even further stress to my team and the organization.
References:
Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making. Harvard Business Review.
Snowden, D. J. (2010, July 11). Cynefin Framework. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=N7oz366X0-8&feature=emb_logo

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Marques

  Dear Marques, You’ve continued to gain a lot more knowledge of leadership, the foundational approaches using different aspects from the elements of theories, and a profound appreciation for senior leaders. The question before you today is – what will you do to get back to the mountain top? Your Personal Vision You’ve stated that your personal vision is “to be happy as much as possible” (Thomey, 2021, p. 2). We both know that you were at your best when you were happiest. Whether on the mountain top or not, you brought out the best in yourself when you were happy. You need to find a way to get back to that place so everything else can fall into place. Three Learning Goals In order to accomplish your personal vision, you must establish three learning goals with milestones so that you have a plan and a pathway for getting this done. Your first goal should be to reengage with the Dale Carnegie group for continuing education classes. I know you found this group to have a tra...

Consequentialism vs Deontology

  Consequentialism vs Deontology Is it a glass half-empty or a glass half-full? It appears to me that what separates consequentialism and deontology is perspective. LaFollette (2007) writes that consequentialists must explain which consequences we should count, how much weight or consideration we should give those that do count, and how we should use these considerations when deliberating (p. 25). However, deontology is usually regarded as a foil to consequentialism ( Heinzelmann, 2018, p. 5201). What I find as the takeaway from this situation is that consequentialism isn’t necessarily grounded in morality, whereas deontology finds itself in a set of negative rules. As LaFollette points out with consequentialism, we must look at and use several dimensions to understand and consider what are the consequences of a situation. Deontology doesn’t require this additional gate check, but instead relies on our experience learning right and wrong from the negative perspective. Much like a...