Skip to main content

When You're Not the Leader

 

As someone that started his career 20 years ago, I had to learn how to be a follower before I could be the leader. In doing so, I had to take orders, follow directions and learn to respond in a way that provided my leaders constructive feedback, otherwise it would appear like I was whining. I got better at being a follower and started learning leadership skills so that one day I could transition to be a leader.

A lot of times not only was I still the follower, but due to the poor or nonexistent leadership, I had to step in and be a leader. On the micro level, a follower can go beyond the formal title and position and participate in the leadership processes. The Harvard Management Update (2009) gives us five ways in which we can do this by establishing goals, thinking systematically, learn from experience while it’s happening, engage others and provide feedback (p. 1). A particular time I’ve been a leader as a follower was when I was working as a robotics manager and my regional maintenance manager was too busy with other priorities. He was also not very good at juggling his responsibilities, which caused a lot of problems with the rest of the staff. Because of this, I stepped up and filled in using some of the examples the Harvard Management Update listed. I clearly set the short-term goals for the team, which was simply to get through each day, one at a time. I was systematic in my thinking as I gathered the data for the problems the team was facing, laid them out for all of us to find the root cause of the problem and implement solutions. In doing so, I engaged the team in every step of our problem-solving so that they would learn from these experiences and do better the next time. It’s important to point out that I was doing this as the problems were occurring so that we all learned from the experience together AND as it was happening in real-time. Lastly, it was really all about the feedback. Because the regional manager was not available, I was the one giving positive and reaffirming feedback to the group so that they knew they were doing a great job.  

Using adaptive leadership can feel like we’re operating in the unknown. We may be thrust into different roles at a moments notice, especially when organizations are floundering through change. Organizational development is no longer an exact science—if ever it was (Cannell, & Seminary, 2011, p. 26). There are so many options and theories now that it can seem like a never-ending cycle. The old way of leading by command, control, direction and charisma through superior knowledge and personality does not really stack up any more, as increasingly better educated followers know faster than leaders what is happening and often what needs to be done (Obolensky, 2010, p. 18). The actions we take should be reflective, like getting onto the balcony to see everything in its whole state. We need to know who the players are, especially in a situation that involves politics. By being open to feedback from anyone, not just the top leaders of an organization, will help further develop the people and team and define the common pathways that remove resistance from workers tasks. For me, it will always be about helping people or the team. To do that more efficiently and create an impact, I will be positive, welcoming and embrace the challenges that we all face, together.

References

Cannell, L., & Seminary, N. P. T. (2011). Adaptive leadership: Planning in a time of transition. Theological Education46(2), 25-45.

How to Lead When You’re Not the Boss. (2009). Harvard Management Update, 14(3), 1-2.

Obolensky, N. (2010). Complex adaptive leadership: Embracing paradox and uncertainty. Burlington, Vt: Gower Pub. Limited.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How I make choosing easier

In Sheena Iyengar’s TEDx video (2011), she describes four techniques you can use to improve choosing or decision-making. These techniques included cut, concretize, categorize and condition. Each technique is unique, and I have used these at one point or another in my life. As Iyengar describes it, she says to “be choosy about choosing” (Iyengar, 2011) which is a brilliant statement that summarizes her video about making choices. Whether you’re a child or an adult, everyone goes through each day having to make many decisions. All too often, we over complicate scenarios in which we could have used these techniques to improve our decision-making. The two techniques I’d like to discuss are cut and categorize. Cut or cutting, involves reducing or outright eliminating choices from the decision matrix. In order to make choosing easier, we must reduce the number of choices. Iyengar (2011) points out the choice overload problem, where as consumers, we are overloaded with far too many choice...

My Strengths and Weaknesses

  My Distinctive Strengths I feel like a lot of what I do I do really well. When I put my mind to it, I believe I can do whatever I want. I know that I’m well organized, I’m a great communicator, I’m someone that recognizes strengths in other people and I’m also great at building people up. My Potential Strengths I know I can do better in some areas, but certain things prevent me from accomplishing them. Namely, if I don’t already have work in my queue, I’m really not that interested in adding it. This also adds to a lack of focus, which is something I know I should do better. Also, I think I could do a better job at remembering things if I applied myself more to the situation. Dispositions That Support Me My positivity is at the top of the list for me that I don’t want to change. I get so much of my mojo from being and staying positive that I can’t see myself changing this. I also think that my faith is something that I wouldn’t change, unless I did it for myself. That i...

Guns, Guns, Guns

  Guns Do we have a right to bear arms? According to LaFollette (2007), this is a moral question, not a constitutional one (p. 180). The United States Constitution certainly says we do. Millions of citizens would also say we do, as well. Hundreds of years ago, the founding fathers of this country decided that people should be able own firearms. It wasn’t simply owning the weapons that they were intent on stating, but that it was a right of every person. A right means that no one can take it away from you for any reason. Just like freedom of speech, everyone has the right to own a gun. However, there are concerns, rightfully so, from people who wish to create a more sensible approach to this right. Gun control advocates have long considered accidents involving guns a major reason for introducing greater regulation of firearms, including such measures as mandated training for gun purchases, firearm safety locks, and strict limitations on the ownership of handguns ( Utter & Spi...