Skip to main content

The Exercise of Performance in Decision-Making

After reviewing the video by the Harvard Business Review (2010), it becomes clearer to me that the decisions organizations make, especially at the senior leadership level, directly impact the performance of the employees and the overall organization. In the sense of positivity, decisions influence many things, but the fact that the positive nature of certain decisions makes that influence even more impactful. Imagine if you will a decision that negatively influences employee salaries, benefits or more. Wouldn’t you expect that these types of decisions gravely diminish the morale and culture of the organization? Thus, making decisions that create negative influence are those that may create a work environment that decreases the effectiveness and output of the organization. The way in which employee engagement relates to decision making is quite impactful. The more employees are engaged in an organization is translate to the more they are involved with effective decision-making. We cannot always guarantee positive outcomes; many factors that affect these outcomes are out of our control (Hoch, Kunreuther, & Gunther, 2001, p. 275). The fact remains that having an organization which cultivates engagement, positively rewards effective communication and places the decision-making process in a prominent place will result in an enhanced organization moving forward.

Impediments and obstacles that could prevent an organization vary from the complex environment in which they operate. It can be difficult to understand where decisions within the organization are coming from and when this happens, employees may not understand with clear definition who is in charge or who to look to in moments of crisis. However, in the video (2010), Blenko states there are four elements of good decisions: quality, speed, yield, and effort. Although I don’t think there are items missing from her list, Blenko could have stated that measuring the outcomes of these elements will clearly help an organization understand where they can and should improve.

The exercise of watching this video and how the steps and elements involved with decision-making and its influence on an organization performing well are helpful reminders for me as I continue to progress through my professional development. I can use this to help my efforts to be a great leader by positioning myself and the organization I work in a great place now and in the future. I will take this information, reflect on it and develop better strategies to implement so that I help prevent our organization from falling behind in its effectiveness.

References

Harvard Business Review. (2010, October 13). How Companies Can Make Better Decisions, Faster. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AC7ANGMy0yo&feature=emb_logo

Hoch, S., Kunreuther, H., & Gunther, R. (2001). Wharton on making decisions. New York: Wiley.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Marques

  Dear Marques, You’ve continued to gain a lot more knowledge of leadership, the foundational approaches using different aspects from the elements of theories, and a profound appreciation for senior leaders. The question before you today is – what will you do to get back to the mountain top? Your Personal Vision You’ve stated that your personal vision is “to be happy as much as possible” (Thomey, 2021, p. 2). We both know that you were at your best when you were happiest. Whether on the mountain top or not, you brought out the best in yourself when you were happy. You need to find a way to get back to that place so everything else can fall into place. Three Learning Goals In order to accomplish your personal vision, you must establish three learning goals with milestones so that you have a plan and a pathway for getting this done. Your first goal should be to reengage with the Dale Carnegie group for continuing education classes. I know you found this group to have a tra...
Post a Comment
Read more

Consequentialism vs Deontology

  Consequentialism vs Deontology Is it a glass half-empty or a glass half-full? It appears to me that what separates consequentialism and deontology is perspective. LaFollette (2007) writes that consequentialists must explain which consequences we should count, how much weight or consideration we should give those that do count, and how we should use these considerations when deliberating (p. 25). However, deontology is usually regarded as a foil to consequentialism ( Heinzelmann, 2018, p. 5201). What I find as the takeaway from this situation is that consequentialism isn’t necessarily grounded in morality, whereas deontology finds itself in a set of negative rules. As LaFollette points out with consequentialism, we must look at and use several dimensions to understand and consider what are the consequences of a situation. Deontology doesn’t require this additional gate check, but instead relies on our experience learning right and wrong from the negative perspective. Much like a...
Post a Comment
Read more