Skip to main content

Challenging Interventions

 

I’ve watched the Tom Wujec video (TedX, 2010) before and found it interesting in how the exercise of building a tower takes teamwork and each person has a very important role to play. Called the Marshmallow Challenge, teams use marshmallows and other objects to make the best tower in a neat and fun competition. Each team uses their own methods for addressing the problem and Wujec evaluates each on their performance.

Wujec attempts to make a connection with the audience in that successful business minded people perform worse at this exercise than kindergarteners. Wujec says this type of collaborative effort is the essence of the iterative process (2:00). Merriam-Webster defines iterative as utilizing the repetition of a sequence of operations or procedures (Merriam-Webster, 2021). I agree with Wujec’ analysis that kindergartners perform better on the Marshmallow Challenge than MBA students for two reasons. The first is because children at that age think in such simpler and unbiased ways that they’re quick to learn from their mistakes right off the bat. The simplicity in a child can more quickly navigate the challenge and result in more time available for the iterative process to flesh out better ideas or products. The second reason is that adults have much more bias and stronger personalities that would derail the group much faster than with children. Even the smartest MBA students could stumble upon a great answer, but when combined within a team, the timing for those ideas to come to fruition may take longer than the rules allow. When Wujec puts a $10,000 incentive on the exercise, every single team underperforms, and no towers are built. Why, he asks? High stakes have a strong impact (4:10). Children aren’t nearly as influenced as adults are in this circumstance. Adults can more clearly understand the importance of the incentive and the pressure of what winning or losing would mean.

Wujec notes that when you put an executive admin on the team of CEOs, they perform better because the admin has special skills of facilitation (0:45). I would agree with Wujec from my experience with admins. In general, CEOs have reached their positions by being very good at their jobs. Those skillsets don’t necessarily translate into having a skill like that of an admin. This is simply a difference between two positions where one can influence and navigate a company and the other can essentially herd cats. Certain skills are important to have in specific situations.  

If I was asked to facilitate a process intervention workshop, I would take a step back and evaluate the purpose of the exercise. I would ask the questions; Why are we doing this? What benefit will come from this or what am I trying to teach the players? What parameters, guidance or rules should we either put in place or take away? In conducting this modeling and setting the agenda, I would be structuring the challenge for specific purposes. To build a better tower is to build a better team (TedX, 2010). In the spirit of building relationships and teams, I would want the group to take action and work together to solve the challenge. A decision made by group consensus is one that all the members have shared in making one they will support and buy into even though they may not be totally supportive (Brown, 2011, p. 202).

Wujec discusses the hidden assumptions in the exercise and how the marshmallow challenge helps identify these to make people recognize what they’re doing and thinking in an effort to improve. Wujec says we must bring all of our senses to the tasks at hand and apply ourselves in the very best way possible. As he says, we can turn “un-oh” moments into “ta-da” moments (6:22). This is the takeaway that I believe I can immediately use in my own career intervention. Exploring my senses, reflecting upon decisions, and involving my coworkers would be a fantastic start to this challenge.

References

Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Iterative. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved February 2, 2021, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/iterative

TedX. (2010, February). Build a tower, build a team. [Video file]. Retrieved 

https://www.ted.com/talks/tom_wujec_build_a_tower_build_a_team/transcript?language=en

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How I make choosing easier

In Sheena Iyengar’s TEDx video (2011), she describes four techniques you can use to improve choosing or decision-making. These techniques included cut, concretize, categorize and condition. Each technique is unique, and I have used these at one point or another in my life. As Iyengar describes it, she says to “be choosy about choosing” (Iyengar, 2011) which is a brilliant statement that summarizes her video about making choices. Whether you’re a child or an adult, everyone goes through each day having to make many decisions. All too often, we over complicate scenarios in which we could have used these techniques to improve our decision-making. The two techniques I’d like to discuss are cut and categorize. Cut or cutting, involves reducing or outright eliminating choices from the decision matrix. In order to make choosing easier, we must reduce the number of choices. Iyengar (2011) points out the choice overload problem, where as consumers, we are overloaded with far too many choice...

My Strengths and Weaknesses

  My Distinctive Strengths I feel like a lot of what I do I do really well. When I put my mind to it, I believe I can do whatever I want. I know that I’m well organized, I’m a great communicator, I’m someone that recognizes strengths in other people and I’m also great at building people up. My Potential Strengths I know I can do better in some areas, but certain things prevent me from accomplishing them. Namely, if I don’t already have work in my queue, I’m really not that interested in adding it. This also adds to a lack of focus, which is something I know I should do better. Also, I think I could do a better job at remembering things if I applied myself more to the situation. Dispositions That Support Me My positivity is at the top of the list for me that I don’t want to change. I get so much of my mojo from being and staying positive that I can’t see myself changing this. I also think that my faith is something that I wouldn’t change, unless I did it for myself. That i...

Guns, Guns, Guns

  Guns Do we have a right to bear arms? According to LaFollette (2007), this is a moral question, not a constitutional one (p. 180). The United States Constitution certainly says we do. Millions of citizens would also say we do, as well. Hundreds of years ago, the founding fathers of this country decided that people should be able own firearms. It wasn’t simply owning the weapons that they were intent on stating, but that it was a right of every person. A right means that no one can take it away from you for any reason. Just like freedom of speech, everyone has the right to own a gun. However, there are concerns, rightfully so, from people who wish to create a more sensible approach to this right. Gun control advocates have long considered accidents involving guns a major reason for introducing greater regulation of firearms, including such measures as mandated training for gun purchases, firearm safety locks, and strict limitations on the ownership of handguns ( Utter & Spi...