Skip to main content

Self-managing teams

 

Having watched the video by Insead (2008), it is clear to me that I’ve evolved from a traditional top-down leader and more so into one that is flexible, forgiving and allows high-performers to do their jobs. Previously, I had been more of a tactical leader with my nose to the ground so that I didn’t miss anything and could report back with all the information. But watching this video and learning more about operating outside of my comfort zone, I believe I can conduct myself in a way that promotes others to own their own destiny and deliver in an efficient way. With self-managed teams (SMT), it is less about me telling others what to do, but rather us doing it together. Management by objectives (MBO) may be defined as a system of management set up to help in planning, organizing problem solving, motivating and other important managerial activities (Brown, 2011, p. 324). This approach sets the stage for allowing the communication to flow freely, as everyone in the group is on the same level.

The major benefits of SMT is that they can be much more effective and efficient in accomplishing their tasks. Rather than a traditional leader orchestrating from a polyarchy position, the team is flatten and this allows more focus to be put on the work instead of the rules. The SMT are knowledge based and allow high performers to do their job with little input from the leader. As long as the leader has coordinated the proper boundaries and shown restraint from stepping in to solve problems, the team will model their behavior in such a way that continues to keep the focus on the work and tasks, rather than the outlining procedures.

Drawbacks of SMT is that it won’t work without the right type of leader. The SMT leader needs to step aside and allow the team to do their jobs without much intervention and to let the process unfold. The right type of leader will know when to step in to set boundaries, parameters and to offer coaching. If the leader is not capable of these elements, the team will most likely fail.

The right competencies will allow the leader to be effective in this setting. Those competencies, as I’ve mentioned previously, are to let the team police itself. The leader must understand the roles of each member, but should also operate in a less direct manner, be flexible and let the team decide what is important. The leader should use less traditional leadership and instead offer feedback to guide the team, rather than direct it.

I believe I would operate well within an SMT because I’ve learned that allowing high performers to do their jobs is the most effective way to be a leader and still produce the best results. The more tactical and micromanaging occurs, the less effective the team will be. I consider myself more of an inspiring visionary type of leader, and has Insead (2008) points out, this is what fits best with the SMT.  

References

Brown, D. R. (2011). An Experimental Approach to Organization Development. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.

Insead. (2008, September 22). Self-managing teams: debunking the leadership paradox. [Video file]. Retrieved https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBnR00qgGgM&feature=emb_logo

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How I make choosing easier

In Sheena Iyengar’s TEDx video (2011), she describes four techniques you can use to improve choosing or decision-making. These techniques included cut, concretize, categorize and condition. Each technique is unique, and I have used these at one point or another in my life. As Iyengar describes it, she says to “be choosy about choosing” (Iyengar, 2011) which is a brilliant statement that summarizes her video about making choices. Whether you’re a child or an adult, everyone goes through each day having to make many decisions. All too often, we over complicate scenarios in which we could have used these techniques to improve our decision-making. The two techniques I’d like to discuss are cut and categorize. Cut or cutting, involves reducing or outright eliminating choices from the decision matrix. In order to make choosing easier, we must reduce the number of choices. Iyengar (2011) points out the choice overload problem, where as consumers, we are overloaded with far too many choice...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Strengths and Weaknesses

  My Distinctive Strengths I feel like a lot of what I do I do really well. When I put my mind to it, I believe I can do whatever I want. I know that I’m well organized, I’m a great communicator, I’m someone that recognizes strengths in other people and I’m also great at building people up. My Potential Strengths I know I can do better in some areas, but certain things prevent me from accomplishing them. Namely, if I don’t already have work in my queue, I’m really not that interested in adding it. This also adds to a lack of focus, which is something I know I should do better. Also, I think I could do a better job at remembering things if I applied myself more to the situation. Dispositions That Support Me My positivity is at the top of the list for me that I don’t want to change. I get so much of my mojo from being and staying positive that I can’t see myself changing this. I also think that my faith is something that I wouldn’t change, unless I did it for myself. That i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Guns, Guns, Guns

  Guns Do we have a right to bear arms? According to LaFollette (2007), this is a moral question, not a constitutional one (p. 180). The United States Constitution certainly says we do. Millions of citizens would also say we do, as well. Hundreds of years ago, the founding fathers of this country decided that people should be able own firearms. It wasn’t simply owning the weapons that they were intent on stating, but that it was a right of every person. A right means that no one can take it away from you for any reason. Just like freedom of speech, everyone has the right to own a gun. However, there are concerns, rightfully so, from people who wish to create a more sensible approach to this right. Gun control advocates have long considered accidents involving guns a major reason for introducing greater regulation of firearms, including such measures as mandated training for gun purchases, firearm safety locks, and strict limitations on the ownership of handguns ( Utter & Spi...
Post a Comment
Read more