Skip to main content

The Outdoor Lab

 

I recently watched a video about team development and how activities built around teamwork adds value to an organization. The EcoSeagate video (Chao, 2008) outlines the vision of CEO Bill Watkins of how he sees teamwork, comradery, and collaboration both in and out of the workplace. EcoSeagate culminates in a 4-kilometer adventure race through a course consisting of liking, climbing, traversing canyons on cables, and running (Brown, 2011, p. 274).

The application of the race and its impact on employees cannot be understated. I feel that there is value in the EcoSeagate team mainly because I have participated in outdoor experimental laboratory training activities like this and understand how it applies to greater organizational output and cohesiveness among employees. The learning provides participants with insights into their leadership and interpersonal styles (Brown, 2011, p. 274). In my experience, I found that these outdoor laboratories work as long as they are focused in content and delivery. What I mean by this is you won’t get the correct results if you shove too much and sometimes not enough into the event. For example, an outdoor training session I attended lacked the right guidance because the leader didn’t have enough help. One person to guide a group of 20 people is difficult because it forces them to try and do everything. There were occasions when someone needed individual help and it left the rest of the group to twiddle their thumbs in the meantime. The laboratory shouldn’t completely revolve around work, either. Participants should have fun and do not need to be constantly drawing parallels between the lab and the work site (Brown, 2011, p. 276). But, when there are enough people to lead the group and the topics aren’t always about the job, it becomes an amazing sight to see people working together, especially in high-performing organizations. In these situations, people are using a lot of resources to accomplish their tasks and when you spend that kind of time working with others, it can be exhausting. People need to unwind, but in a way that allows them to continue to bond with coworkers, learn to build trust with people and accomplish something that isn’t related to the everyday job. The outdoor event I attended did just that; it gave us a chance to learn and do something new and different, while at the same time it caused us to lean on each other, motivate each other and raise up one another when we accomplished something good.

I believe that an outdoor laboratory would be beneficial to my organization for many of the same reasons I already mentioned. Creating positive relationships at work is important to productivity. Having the opportunity to do this in an outdoor setting with the people I see pushing paper around the office sounds fun regardless of the intentions of the laboratory. I know from my experiences these events can bring out the best in people and help stoke their creativity. For me, it’s an opportunity to talk about something other than work, to be outside with my colleagues and practice being a follower and a leader.

References

Brown, D. R. (2011). An Experimental Approach to Organization Development. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.

Chao, M. (2008, April 26). Eco Seagate 2008. [Video file]. Retrieved https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Etwuap-_Azk&feature=emb_logo

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How I make choosing easier

In Sheena Iyengar’s TEDx video (2011), she describes four techniques you can use to improve choosing or decision-making. These techniques included cut, concretize, categorize and condition. Each technique is unique, and I have used these at one point or another in my life. As Iyengar describes it, she says to “be choosy about choosing” (Iyengar, 2011) which is a brilliant statement that summarizes her video about making choices. Whether you’re a child or an adult, everyone goes through each day having to make many decisions. All too often, we over complicate scenarios in which we could have used these techniques to improve our decision-making. The two techniques I’d like to discuss are cut and categorize. Cut or cutting, involves reducing or outright eliminating choices from the decision matrix. In order to make choosing easier, we must reduce the number of choices. Iyengar (2011) points out the choice overload problem, where as consumers, we are overloaded with far too many choice...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Strengths and Weaknesses

  My Distinctive Strengths I feel like a lot of what I do I do really well. When I put my mind to it, I believe I can do whatever I want. I know that I’m well organized, I’m a great communicator, I’m someone that recognizes strengths in other people and I’m also great at building people up. My Potential Strengths I know I can do better in some areas, but certain things prevent me from accomplishing them. Namely, if I don’t already have work in my queue, I’m really not that interested in adding it. This also adds to a lack of focus, which is something I know I should do better. Also, I think I could do a better job at remembering things if I applied myself more to the situation. Dispositions That Support Me My positivity is at the top of the list for me that I don’t want to change. I get so much of my mojo from being and staying positive that I can’t see myself changing this. I also think that my faith is something that I wouldn’t change, unless I did it for myself. That i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Guns, Guns, Guns

  Guns Do we have a right to bear arms? According to LaFollette (2007), this is a moral question, not a constitutional one (p. 180). The United States Constitution certainly says we do. Millions of citizens would also say we do, as well. Hundreds of years ago, the founding fathers of this country decided that people should be able own firearms. It wasn’t simply owning the weapons that they were intent on stating, but that it was a right of every person. A right means that no one can take it away from you for any reason. Just like freedom of speech, everyone has the right to own a gun. However, there are concerns, rightfully so, from people who wish to create a more sensible approach to this right. Gun control advocates have long considered accidents involving guns a major reason for introducing greater regulation of firearms, including such measures as mandated training for gun purchases, firearm safety locks, and strict limitations on the ownership of handguns ( Utter & Spi...
Post a Comment
Read more