Skip to main content

Guns, Guns, Guns

 

Guns

Do we have a right to bear arms? According to LaFollette (2007), this is a moral question, not a constitutional one (p. 180). The United States Constitution certainly says we do. Millions of citizens would also say we do, as well. Hundreds of years ago, the founding fathers of this country decided that people should be able own firearms. It wasn’t simply owning the weapons that they were intent on stating, but that it was a right of every person. A right means that no one can take it away from you for any reason. Just like freedom of speech, everyone has the right to own a gun. However, there are concerns, rightfully so, from people who wish to create a more sensible approach to this right. Gun control advocates have long considered accidents involving guns a major reason for introducing greater regulation of firearms, including such measures as mandated training for gun purchases, firearm safety locks, and strict limitations on the ownership of handguns (Utter & Spitzer, 2016, p. 3). But these efforts continually are met with resistance by the opposition. These oppositionists peddle the narrative that owning a gun is equally as important as any of the other rights we have as citizens of this country. But this right comes at a cost.

More guns

I’ve always believed that people should have the right to own firearms. However, I would also be the first in line to give up my right to own firearms if it meant that no one could own a gun, and there would be no more senseless deaths caused by someone that killed their family, their neighbor, or their coworkers. It is almost a daily occurrence where we see on the news another person took the lives of innocent people all because they had access to a firearm. Are we morally obligated to stop this nonsense? Are we as a nation capable of standing up to the corporations, and politicians that continue to be financed by the gun industry? Thus far, we have not.

ALL THE GUNS

For those that demand we not change the narrative and keep guns in the hands of responsible gun owners, I say to you – good for you. The United States of America was founded hundreds of years ago with principles that allowed individuals the right to bear arms. Although centuries have passed, what has remained are the rights granted to citizens that include owning firearms. To them, owning a gun is a fundamental right reserved for them, and every other gun toting person, which is something no one can take away from them, ever. If someone attempts to take the guns from them, attempts to further regulate guns by reducing their options, or makes the situation more difficult for them, then there will be problems.

The right to own a gun goes back so far that it makes this country a gun nation. Will it ever change? Not anytime soon.

References

LaFollette, H. (2007). The practice of ethics. In The practice of ethics (pp. 8-21). Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

Utter, G., & Spitzer, R. (2016). The gun debate: an encyclopedia of gun control & gun rights in the United States (Third edition.). Grey House Publishing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Team level ICT

  Team level ICT Learning more about Intentional Change Theory (ICT) draws my attention closer to the individual level of the change. We understand the path involves specific steps within the individual mental process, however, there is much to be learned about applying ICT to a team concept. “ At the group level, the ideal self could be described as a shared ideal, or vision, which would be derived through: ·        emergent awareness of a shared hope; ·        collective imagery regarding the ideal purpose and functioning of the group; and ·        realization and articulation of a core identity of the group.” ( Akrivou, 2016, p. 699). Applying this concept to historical events might make it easier to understand. Take for instance the United States Women’s Olympic Soccer teams from the last 30 years and their shear dominance of the sport. These teams operated at such a high level f...

Dear Marques

  Dear Marques, You’ve continued to gain a lot more knowledge of leadership, the foundational approaches using different aspects from the elements of theories, and a profound appreciation for senior leaders. The question before you today is – what will you do to get back to the mountain top? Your Personal Vision You’ve stated that your personal vision is “to be happy as much as possible” (Thomey, 2021, p. 2). We both know that you were at your best when you were happiest. Whether on the mountain top or not, you brought out the best in yourself when you were happy. You need to find a way to get back to that place so everything else can fall into place. Three Learning Goals In order to accomplish your personal vision, you must establish three learning goals with milestones so that you have a plan and a pathway for getting this done. Your first goal should be to reengage with the Dale Carnegie group for continuing education classes. I know you found this group to have a tra...

Framing Complex Decisions

At the nation’s 18 th busiest airport, Detroit Metro Airport is not immune to complex decision-making. Simple decisions can sometimes turn into much more complex issues and vice versa. Complex issues can seldom be solved within a single frame ( Hoch, Kunreuther, & Gunther, 2001, p. 154). As I’ve learned, frames not only work as a tool to understand problems from different points of view, they can also provide clarity, especially when dealing with complex issues. For example, take root cause analysis (RCA) and how simple methods of determine how and why something failed can be applied to the organization so that you can prevent the same mistake from happening again and again. As simple as the method is of asking why something failed, you’d think we were teaching skilled trades personnel Latin. Incorporating a change like RCA takes a lot of time and patience. They way in which we approached our teams to include RCA in their routines first involved identifying and analyzing a...