Skip to main content

Team level ICT

 

Team level ICT

Learning more about Intentional Change Theory (ICT) draws my attention closer to the individual level of the change. We understand the path involves specific steps within the individual mental process, however, there is much to be learned about applying ICT to a team concept. “At the group level, the ideal self could be described as a shared ideal, or vision, which would be derived through:

·       emergent awareness of a shared hope;

·       collective imagery regarding the ideal purpose and functioning of the group; and

·       realization and articulation of a core identity of the group.” (Akrivou, 2016, p. 699).

Applying this concept to historical events might make it easier to understand. Take for instance the United States Women’s Olympic Soccer teams from the last 30 years and their shear dominance of the sport. These teams operated at such a high level for so long, it had to take something more than individual personalities to be this successful. The teams we saw capture gold medal after gold medal seemingly had one goal, and one goal only – to win. Midfielder Heather O'Reilly said, "I think our team feels like we still have some unfinished business. I think that although a silver medal at the World Cup isn't something to be completely devastated about, I think that we were disappointed that we didn't come home with gold," she said. (Brewer, 2012). This drive and determination as a member of the team helped create the intentional change they needed to overcome the toughest competition in the world.

Switching sports, and genders, we arrive at the United States Men’s Olympic Basketball team from 2004. Each year, as they’ve been known as “The Dream Team”, the US men’s teams had consistently performed well by winning the gold medal. However, the team in 2004 lost their way and suffered more losses than any other US men’s team since the 1988 Olympics. While you can place blame on the process for selecting the team, the individuals, and coach, you can also look to see how an unbalanced mix of very young talent with few veterans as the reason there was no cohesiveness in their eventual shortcomings in route to the bronze medal.

The ICT differences

Soccer and basketball are two very different team sports. Soccer requires more team unity than basketball, in my opinion, whereas basketball leans on individual stars much more. With soccer, there are eleven players on the field for each team, and basketball only has five. Errors or mistakes made in one sport have a different outcome in another. There’s also the potential for younger players to miss the mark when it comes to team comradery. I have seen older, and wiser players realize that to win, you must sacrifice. That sacrifice can come in many forms, but it generally means to allow other players to shine, and not try and do things all by yourself. The differences between the women’s and men’s teams take many of these elements into account. The men’s team had no joint identify to speak of, where the women’s team was clearly a closer unit of teammates. The women’s teams had been playing together for a longer period of time, where the men’s team roster had significant turnover from the previous Olympics. This lack of connection and purpose were some of the driving factors as to why the men’s team failed to show up in 2004.

I believe we can all learn from this example by understanding as individuals we have different needs, but as a team, we must huddle around each other, and understand our roles to the betterment of the team. Only after we understand the shared vision can we truly operate as a team.

References

Akrivou, K., Boyatzis, R. E., & McLeod, P. L. (2006). The evolving group: Towards a prescriptive theory of intentional group development. The Journal of Management Development, 25(7), 689-706. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610678490

Brewer, P. (2012). US women's soccer team ready for Olympic gold. Washington: Federal Information & News Dispatch, LLC.

 

 

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How I make choosing easier

In Sheena Iyengar’s TEDx video (2011), she describes four techniques you can use to improve choosing or decision-making. These techniques included cut, concretize, categorize and condition. Each technique is unique, and I have used these at one point or another in my life. As Iyengar describes it, she says to “be choosy about choosing” (Iyengar, 2011) which is a brilliant statement that summarizes her video about making choices. Whether you’re a child or an adult, everyone goes through each day having to make many decisions. All too often, we over complicate scenarios in which we could have used these techniques to improve our decision-making. The two techniques I’d like to discuss are cut and categorize. Cut or cutting, involves reducing or outright eliminating choices from the decision matrix. In order to make choosing easier, we must reduce the number of choices. Iyengar (2011) points out the choice overload problem, where as consumers, we are overloaded with far too many choice...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Strengths and Weaknesses

  My Distinctive Strengths I feel like a lot of what I do I do really well. When I put my mind to it, I believe I can do whatever I want. I know that I’m well organized, I’m a great communicator, I’m someone that recognizes strengths in other people and I’m also great at building people up. My Potential Strengths I know I can do better in some areas, but certain things prevent me from accomplishing them. Namely, if I don’t already have work in my queue, I’m really not that interested in adding it. This also adds to a lack of focus, which is something I know I should do better. Also, I think I could do a better job at remembering things if I applied myself more to the situation. Dispositions That Support Me My positivity is at the top of the list for me that I don’t want to change. I get so much of my mojo from being and staying positive that I can’t see myself changing this. I also think that my faith is something that I wouldn’t change, unless I did it for myself. That i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Guns, Guns, Guns

  Guns Do we have a right to bear arms? According to LaFollette (2007), this is a moral question, not a constitutional one (p. 180). The United States Constitution certainly says we do. Millions of citizens would also say we do, as well. Hundreds of years ago, the founding fathers of this country decided that people should be able own firearms. It wasn’t simply owning the weapons that they were intent on stating, but that it was a right of every person. A right means that no one can take it away from you for any reason. Just like freedom of speech, everyone has the right to own a gun. However, there are concerns, rightfully so, from people who wish to create a more sensible approach to this right. Gun control advocates have long considered accidents involving guns a major reason for introducing greater regulation of firearms, including such measures as mandated training for gun purchases, firearm safety locks, and strict limitations on the ownership of handguns ( Utter & Spi...
Post a Comment
Read more